Why won't the media talk about Exosomes?

Updated: Nov 25, 2020

Is it because they are the key to the Covid19 magic trick?

Exosomes are an exciting new field of study in biology and are changing the way scientists think about and understand the immune system. Exosomes are always present in EVERYONE and in varying amounts depending on one's overall level of health. They are situated within the very cells of our bodies and can be stimulated to emerge whenever we are undergoing stress, a cellular detoxification process or “viral” cleansing (e.g. when we are sick of something, like a cold, flu, cancer, diabetes, etc.) or if we are being bombarded by an external insult such as excessive EMF or other radiation (e.g. Fukushima, Chernobyl, high power transmission lines, microwaves, cellular broadcast towers, or 4G/5G).

Exosomes serve as messengers to the rest of the immune system to summon other "helpers" to the scene (like T-cells, lymphocytes, macrophages, white blood cells, etc.). These collectively form the cleanup crews or janitors of the body which, if they get overwhelmed by the poisonous cellular excretions (as can occur during radiation or chemotherapy treatment), are then aided by “viruses” which are merely protein fragments wrapped in a lipid layer of fat. Viruses are manufactured within the body as an immune system response and act as a soap, or a solvent, coming to the rescue to encapsulate the toxins to help move them to the lymphatic system for eventual elimination in feces, urine, sweat, and respiration.

Think about why you add laundry detergent to the wash machine. Soap is an emulsifier that surrounds the dirt and grease in the clothes by encapsulating it with a slippery layer of animal or vegetable fat which helps it to slide out of the wash during the rinse cycle. The reason we get a fever when we are sick is to help speed up the circulation to allow these non-living, immobile, non-self-propelled viral soaps/solvents to slip slide the encapsulated toxins to the lymphatic system for later elimination. Viruses are NOT alive, cannot reproduce, and are generally dormant within our bodies until called into action by the RNA messengers or dispatchers of the immune system known as exosomes.

Our bodies have an estimated 60 trillion cells, 30 million microbes, spores and bacteria, and 385 trillion viruses of over 300,000 different varieties. Each virus is manufactured and activated "on-demand", and encoded to work specifically with only certain parts of specific target cells, without compromising the integrity of the entire cell. Viruses that are coded to function with lung cells will not be found in the rest of the body.

Viruses are NOT infectious, they are NOT alive, they Do NOT self-replicate, and are Not transmittable inter-species or cross-species, and therefore cannot cause disease in other people UNLESS injected, which would then stimulate a similar immune response designed to cleanse that body of the injected invader. Viruses are helpers of the immune system and are NOT typically harmful. This is obviously contrary to what we have been told based on the standard concept, but incorrect adaptation, of Louis Pasteur's germ theory of infection. A viral detoxification is actually an OUTfection and not in INfection. When you hear the media or medical people talk about "killing" the virus with disinfectants, that is a meaningless statement. A virus does not have a nucleus and is not alive to begin with. How can you kill something that is not even alive? A more accurate term might be to "inactivate" or "deactivate" the virus, as in rendering it useless as an immune system soap or solvent.

Understanding this simple concept is the key to understanding Covid19.

Surprisingly, no peer-reviewed research study to date has EVER conclusively proven the existence of a contagious naturally-occurring infectious “virus”, of any kind, let alone one that causes the condition now called Covid19. To do so, one would need to follow Koch’s Postulates (use the search bar above to look for articles on this site containing koch or exosome), which is the gold standard scientific method of testing taught to every medical student as part of their "germ theory" studies. It requires that 1) one must be able to isolate, purify, and identify a suspect microorganism from a sick person that is ALWAYS present in those showing disease symptoms; 2) it must be able to cause the same symptoms and sickness 100% of the time in a healthy uninfected subject when exposed to that same isolated microorganism; and finally 3) it must be able to be re-isolated, re-purified, and re-identified from the newly sickened subject and compared identically to the original suspect microorganism. Only then can one assign causation and NOT mere association or correlation.

This has NOT been done with any microorganism blamed for Covid19.

The best way to comprehend this is by way of analogy. Let's say that you came across a house fire in the neighborhood and you saw ten firemen standing around looking at the fire. Would you assume that they were the CAUSE of the fire? No, of course not; that would be absurd! Based on your common sense understanding of fireman, you would assume they were there to put out the fire and not start the fire.


Exosomes are like the firefighters; they are associated with the fire but they did not cause the fire, which is known as a cytokine storm; they are there to put it out, whatever the underlying cause. Just because exosomes are present at the scene of the “fire” or illness, that does not mean they are the cause of the fire (e.g. flu-like symptoms allegedly caused by a coronavirus infection) since such an assumed-to-exist viral pathogen has NEVER been isolated, purified, and identified as a causative agent of the condition they are now calling Covid19. Yet that scary-looking computer-enhanced red-spiked coronavirus shown all over the media and in our logo looks EXACTLY like an exosome in all respects!

The following slides are excerpts from this post on our page featuring Dr. Andrew Kaufman. It was this very video that inspired our editor to develop this entire news service when he realized the depth of the deception being foisted on the world. If you read nothing else on this site, PLEASE take the time to study this article now. It will awaken even the most stubborn cognitive dissonance-afflicted person to the reality of the Covid19 deception.


The Truth about Covid19 Tests

You have not doubt heard the media report that someone died AFTER TESTING POSITIVE for Covid19. But what does that really mean?

Why does the mainstream media not ask the right questions, such as: 

  • Does a positive test prove the existence of an infection of coronavirus?

  • Does a positive test mean the person died OF/FROM coronavirus or just WITH coronavirus?

  • If someone dies with blue eyes, did he die OF/FROM the blues eyes? 

  • What does the test actually test for? What does it find? 

  • How many false positive or false negative results does it give?

  • Is mere association with an exosome the same as causation by a coronavirus?

  • Are there other interpretations or explanations for the test results?

  • How much alleged viral load is required to cause Covid19 symptoms or death?

  • How long must someone be exposed to the alleged virus to get infected? 

  • What does the Nobel prizing-winner inventor of the test have to say about it?

  • Should the test be used at all?

Answering these questions is crucial to the interpretation of the test data.

The RT-PCR test currently being used world-wide ONLY tests for an RNA messenger protein fragment (an exosome) that is assumed to be evidence of a SARS-COV-2 infection but which is also associated with dozens or hundreds of other possible causes.

Here are some causes which induce exosomes

  • Toxic substances

  • Stress (fear)

  • Cancer

  • Ionizing radiation

  • Infection

  • Injury

  • Immune system response

  • Asthma

  • Diseases

  • Electromagnetic radiation (Wi-Fi, cellular, satellite, 5G, ???)

THE RT-PCR TEST DOES NOT TEST FOR A VIRUS!

Here is how it works. The collected sample is incubated in a culture dish and then examined for evidence of an assumed pathogen. However, the Vero monkey cell cultures erroneously being used are NOT pure cultures, as they contain metastasized (cancerous) green monkey liver cells treated with antibiotics. These impure cultures are used to incubate materials taken from nasal swabs or other bodily tissues. When combined with the addition of antibiotics to those cultures to prevent a bacterial overgrowth which would cloud the results, a tremendous number of exosomes are released by the monkey cells in the culture which can then cause the test to falsely show positive, even without the test sample swab being added to the culture! 

Now think about that – if the petri dish you are growing your sample in produces exosomes, and the test is actually detecting the presence of the genetic marker called an exosome which is only assumed to be associated with a SARS-Cov2 coronavirus infection, then how can you tell if it is the virus or the culture that is giving the positive result? 

The observed microorganism growth is then copied or "amplified" many times to make it large enough to be studied. The number of amplifications (or copies) of the RNA fragment being made during the testing procedure is recommended at 35-45 cycles so as to multiply the material sufficiently large enough to be studied. The inventor of the test, Karry Mullis, specifically indicates that no more than 25 amplifications should be used because, at these rates of amplification, it can result in an 80%+ false positive rate (65 amplifications could yield 100% false positives). Under a microscope, the particle they tell us is the coronavirus is identical to an exosome. In fact, James Hildreth, formerly of Johns Hopkins University, says that “the virus is fully an exosome in every sense of the word.” (see the slide show above for details). Others state that it is only finding the presence of cellular protein waste fragments or left over proteins used as the building blocks of numerous other structures.

According to Jason Hommel, a prolific writer and researcher, and the author of a very important article regarding coronavirus testing entitled


Scientists Say the COVID19 Test Kits Do Not Work, Are Worthless, and Give Impossible Results:

“PCR basically takes a sample of your cells and amplifies any DNA to look for ‘viral sequences’, (i.e. bits of non-human DNA that seem to match parts of a known viral genome). The problem is the test is known not to work. It uses ‘amplification’ which means taking a very very tiny amount of DNA and growing it exponentially billions of times until it can be analysed. Obviously, any minute contamination in the sample will also be amplified leading to potentially gross errors of discovery. Additionally, it’s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you ignore the other issues. 


The idea these kits can isolate a specific virus like COVID-19 is nonsense.”

He adds, “The first thing to know is that the test is not binary. In fact, I don’t think there are any tests for infectious disease that are positive or negative. What they do is they take some kind of a continuum and they arbitrarily say this point is the difference between positive and negative.” When asked if people should get tested, he said the following: 

“Don’t do it, I say, when people ask me. No healthy person should be tested. It means nothing but it can destroy your life, make you absolutely miserable. Every time somebody takes a swab, a tissue sample of their DNA, it goes into a government database. It’s to track us. They’re not just looking for the virus. Please put that in your article.”

Here is a useful analogy to understand the concept: Imagine finding a small metal machine screw in a parking lot, making one million copies of it through the RT-PCR method, and then determining with confidence that it came uniquely from a vintage red 1967 Ford Mustang convertible with tan leather interior and a beige top. That's the level of accuracy you are expecting in order to determine that the screw came from a particular make and model of car based solely on the mere association of one screw that may have been used in the building of that car! But is that screw unique to only that car or is it a common building block used in many types of cars? In the case of SARS-Cov2, the RT-PCR test is only looking at a very small protein fragment of RNA that is estimated to be some 300-600 base pairs long out of a possible genomic sequence that is 42,000 base pairs long (the rungs on the spiral helix DNA ladder).