top of page

Guest Profile

Dr. David Martin

Dr. David Martin

Years of Experience

Dr. David Martin

Scan QR code for the link to this page.

Corporate Advisor | Entrepreneur | Financier | Storyteller | Professor | Inventor

About David Martin

https://www.davidmartin.world/about 


Official website:

https://davidmartin.world


YouTube Channel:

https://www.youtube.com/c/DavidMartinWorld/videos


Blog:

https://invertedalchemy.com


Facebook:

https://facebook.com/fullyliveworld


M-CAM home:

https://m-cam.com


Dr. David Martin Exposes the False Foundation of Eugenics: "You Don't Have DNA"


Dr. David Martin:


I’m going to offend just about everyone in the room about what I am going to say about science.


He then describes what a “tapestry” is.


Well it turns out, that you do not have DNA. You have chromosomes. Nature made chromosomes. It turns out that a nasty photograph, and it wasn’t really a photograph, it was an x-ray photograph, plate 51, taken in 1952. DNA is not a product of nature. It is a model of human manipulation.


DNA is not a product of nature, it is a characteristic, it’s a model of human manipulation. That first image, 1952, Raymond Gosling and Rosalind Franklin, the first people who actually characterized the double helix called deoxyribonucleic acid, they were the first ones to discover that there was an interesting orientation of the molecule deoxyribonucleic acid.


And it was then a year later that Watson and Crick were celebrated for actually coming up with the “invention” of DNA. But, it turns out they didn’t invent anything, they actually built a model. But the model was analogous to untying the tapestry of life in the form of chromosomes, and putting the untied strings on the floor and saying “describe humanity.”


Funded by foundations funded by life insurance companies. Why do you think the Nobel Prize was awarded to people who didn’t even discover the thing? Watson and Crick had nothing to do with discovering anything. They happened to be eugenicists, who had supported a cover story that would tell science: “don’t look anywhere else, only look to the double helix.”


I am going to go out on a limb here for you. Chromosomes, being paramagnetic, wound heli-coils of conductive material, are quite possibly antenna. They’re quite possibly not chemistry at all.


And it turns out I’ve proven that in the lab.If you wonder why the magnetic experiment that you’re going to hear about from Dr. Carrie is so damn interesting, it’s NOT because of DNA, it’s NOT because of RNA, it’s because they are putting an antenna into your body to screw up the transmissions of all the wisdom of the cosmos so that you are detached from being human.


And if you knew what it really was, it is a wound heliocol antenna, it was an antenna that was made so that we stayed in touch with our creation and creator. That’s what it was.And in 1953 we defiled it. And we have spent billions of dollars describing life through untied strings of a tapestry, and then mysteriously come to the conclusion that 95% of DNA is just junk DNA.Really?


It turns out that the reason why we don’t understand life is because we untied the majesty of the tapestry of life, and then tried to describe life through the pile of strings we put on the floor.


There is no such thing as a DNA – RNA relationship. That’s a model.And by the way I am not criticizing the people who use models to describe things. That’s not the point.I’m talking about life! That’s what I am talking about. I’m not talking about science. Have at it until the cows come home. Talk about DNA, talk about RNA, talk about transfection and translation and polymerous chains and all kinds of other things – do all of your magic you want and don’t ever tell me that you’ve described a single phenomenon of life. 


Because you have untied the very fabric of the nature of reality and then you’re trying to play God with it. We, the people, have been had.We are not a selective breeding experiment for a petri dish. And I am sick and tired of having this conversation be about whether there’s a virus or not a virus, an RNA or not an RNA…People, if we can’t define life, we will never understand health. Did you hear what I just said? If we do not understand life, we can never define health.


Because, we have decided that we are now this bizarre strand of untied string on the floor, and we’re trying to make sense out of it. This isn’t an accident. This was a design. And it was a design to set in motion the maturity of one the most horrific experiences that is about to befall us. And it by the way has almost nothing to do with COVID or SARS or anything else.

Newspapers

Featured Articles

In some of the videos below, Dr. David Martin methodically and accurately takes apart the phony story that Moderna and Pfizer are delivering vaccines. He reveals that Moderna admits that their patents say 'gene therapy' not 'vaccine.' They put a synthetic RNA fragment embedded into a fat carrier, whose only purpose is to lessen the symptoms associated with the S-1 spike protein, not the actual virus. He proves by referencing the official definition of a vaccine that these are not vaccines. He says you cannot have a vaccine that doesn’t claim to result in either proving immunity or blocking transmission.  These medical devices do neither!


The WHO admits that with these shots don’t do any good. In a virtual press conference earlier this week, WHO chief scientist Soumya Swaminathan was specific: 'I don’t believe we have the evidence on any of the vaccines to be confident that it’s going to prevent people from actually getting the infection and therefore being able to pass it on.' 


By their own patents and reference material, neither Pfizer nor Moderna claims this. Rather they only claim their devices are 'gene therapy.' Q: If this isn’t a vaccine, why are they calling it a vaccine? A: To gain the broad immunity that only vaccines are given. 


The 1986 law on vaccine liability provides an exclusion only for vaccine makers, not for gene therapy—so they would be liable. This is why states are keeping this state of emergency in place to help shield Moderna and Pfizer and the states themselves. The state of emergency maintains the illusion of vaccine shield. 


He then explains from a legal view that Moderna and Pfizer qualify as deceptive marketing practices of making medical claims without clinic trial proof. 15 US Code, Section 41 of the Trade Commission Act is the law on deceptive practices. He shows why Moderna was never a vaccine company. In 2018, it was a gene therapy company, and still is." - Joel Skousen, "Moderna and Pfizer Vaccines not Really Vaccines", World Affairs Brief, 01-15


It is unlawful under the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 41 et seq., to advertise that a product or service can prevent, treat, or cure human disease unless you possess competent and reliable scientific evidence, including, when appropriate, well-controlled human clinical studies, substantiating that the claims are true at the time they are made.


Here are some key links to the research, supporting articles, and transcripts for the video below titled Butterfly of the Week, 11 Jan 2021 - Hidden in Plain Sight - Legal Definitions per Covid19 Vaccines.


Link to sources:

https://www.davidmartin.world/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/BotW_slides_01112021.pdf


Link to transcript:

http://www.davidmartin.world/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/BotW_transcript_01112021.pdf


Other Resources

Guest Videos

Thumbnail
Title
Description
Category
Platform

Guest Podcasts

Thumbnail
Title
Description
Category
bottom of page